Which DSM feature was eliminated in DSM-5 organizational changes?

Prepare for the Social Work Qualifying Practice Exam. Study using flashcards and multiple-choice questions with hints and explanations. Set yourself up for success in your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which DSM feature was eliminated in DSM-5 organizational changes?

Explanation:
This item centers on how DSM-5 reorganized the diagnostic framework by removing the multiaxial structure. In DSM-IV, disorders were arranged across five axes: clinical disorders (Axis I), personality and intellectual disabilities (Axis II), general medical conditions (Axis III), psychosocial and environmental problems (Axis IV), and a global assessment of functioning (Axis V). DSM-5 eliminated this system and moved to a nonaxial, integrated approach where diagnoses, medical conditions, psychosocial/contextual factors, and disability are documented together in a single framework, with separate sections for other conditions that may be a focus of clinical attention. The global assessment of functioning was dropped, and while DSM-5 retains explicit diagnostic criteria, it also adds dimensional and severity specifiers to capture the illness's impact and course. The other options don’t fit because DSM-5 did not remove the inclusion and exclusion criteria embedded in diagnostic criteria, it did not eliminate dimensional assessment entirely (it added dimensional and cross-cutting measures rather than dropping a dimensional approach), and it did not erase broader assessment reforms—those aspects were revised rather than removed.

This item centers on how DSM-5 reorganized the diagnostic framework by removing the multiaxial structure. In DSM-IV, disorders were arranged across five axes: clinical disorders (Axis I), personality and intellectual disabilities (Axis II), general medical conditions (Axis III), psychosocial and environmental problems (Axis IV), and a global assessment of functioning (Axis V). DSM-5 eliminated this system and moved to a nonaxial, integrated approach where diagnoses, medical conditions, psychosocial/contextual factors, and disability are documented together in a single framework, with separate sections for other conditions that may be a focus of clinical attention. The global assessment of functioning was dropped, and while DSM-5 retains explicit diagnostic criteria, it also adds dimensional and severity specifiers to capture the illness's impact and course.

The other options don’t fit because DSM-5 did not remove the inclusion and exclusion criteria embedded in diagnostic criteria, it did not eliminate dimensional assessment entirely (it added dimensional and cross-cutting measures rather than dropping a dimensional approach), and it did not erase broader assessment reforms—those aspects were revised rather than removed.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy